|
Starring:
Rehaan Engineer, Koël Purie, Rahul Bose, Pooja
Bhatt, Boman Irani, and Anahita Oberoi.
Production Design: Aradhana Seth
Costumes: Anaita Shroff
Sound: Resul Pookutty
Editing: Suresh Pai
Cinematography:Vikas Sivaraman
Original Music: Zakir Hussain
Produced by: Viveck Vasvani
Written and Directed by: Rahul Bose
|
|
As
you walk down a not-so-crowded corridor, exiting a theater
having just finished watching Rahul Bose's debut feature as
a director, Everybody Says I'm Fine, almost certainly
you will be confused about what to make of it. The more you
evaluate and analyze it, the more obscure your reactions will
become. Of course, a lot of it depends on the company you've
seen the film with
sometimes 18 year olds can convince
you that American Pie is great cinema; but by large,
if you've watch it alone, even days later certain images from
the film will keep coming back (as they always do) and you
will continue
to spare a moment for it. Then, as you slowly begin to obsess
about it, you'll to turn to the expert critics for their opinion
(they know what they're talking about right?) and come to
the safe conclusion that ESIF is a 'well-tried, but its no
good' kind of film. But you are here now, and we have a little
point to make.
Actually,
Everybody Says I'm Fine is a good film. You go into
it, expecting an English, August or a Bombay Boys,
but the truth of the matter is that ESIF is most unlike any
other commercially made English film in India.
It's
good because of several reasons. Some of these are obvious,
and some not so. The not-so obvious reasons include:
-
The film is not intended for an international (read
festival) audience. It is for English speaking Indians.
-
This has been inferred by the fact that (despite the scene
with the beggars and lepers having a good time at Xen's
expense) Bose is certainly not trying to sell India
with a typical portrayal of a kind of Indianess from a
Western perspective. Thank God for that.
-
There is no deliberate indulgence in trying to
woo a "crossover audience" (whatever that is.)
It's a good story to tell. And Bose has just happened
to do it in English.
The
obvious reasons are several:
- The
script. This is what makes the film work. It is not
irreverent (have you noticed how Upperstall loves irreverent
films? The latest being Kan Nathil
Mutha Mittal) and yet ESIF is fascinating because
of the jigsaw-like yet coherent plot that is woven wonderfully
around a handful of characters and, if you've let go of
trying to predict endings, packs quite a surprise. Here
is a story that you can take and shoot in any country, in
any part of the world, and the result would be the same.
- a.
The story tracks are well thought of an executed. The
Pooja Bhatt-Anahita Oberoi one, in particular, is oustanding.
- The
performances. The best include Pooja Bhatt, Boman
Irani, and Rehaan Engineer. Bhatt is understated and therefore
elegant, and conversely has greater presence. Irani handles
his repetitive role interestingly. Engineer has trained
at RADA.
-
Rahul Bose is slightly over the top, but bearable.
- The
others do more than a fine job, given their limited
scope.
- It
is the one Indian English film where the Indians speaking
English is natural and not stilted.
It
is rumoured that the film was rehearsed for 40 days and
dialogue was moved around if the actors sounded more comfortable
saying something else.
- Vikas
Sivaraman's camerawork is neat and clean. The film
is well shot given the limited space and there is constant
innovation with the focusing and close-ups.
- The
title. One expert critic (don't we love 'em) said
that it was too obvious. Really? More obvious than Mujhe
Kuch Kehna Hai or Kaho Na Pyaar Hai or Mujse
Dosti Karoge or
And finally a list of why the film was not perfect:
-
The psychedelic cloud-cluttered transitions just
won't do.
-
Where is the famed Zakir Hussain meets Carlos Santana soundtrack?
-
The teenage romance is a bit of a sore thumb in an otherwise
tight script.
- Koël
Purie is a huge disappointment. Performance and characterization.
Right
then, the pluses have 8 points with 3 sub-points and the minuses
have 4 points (and no sub-points.) You probably could've skipped
right to here in the first place and put your turbulent mind
to ease as to what to think of the film, but it will always
be Upperstall's prerogative to make sure you know why a film
is good or not good. And we have spoken.
|