Maruti Mera Dosst
1 3
Hindi, Children's Film, 2009, Color
| Starring | |
| Directed by | |
| Produced by | |
| Story | |
| Screenplay | |
| Cinematography | |
| Music | |
| Lyrics | |
| Playback | |
Rameshwari, an innocent eight year old, loses her mother at birth. Brought up by a doting albeit naive father, she wants for nothing but a mother's love. It is this desire that prompts her father Kunwar Raghvendra Singh to marry Mohini. And that's when the dark forces are released in Rameshwari's idyllic life. Because with her stepmother arrives the evil and diabolical, Kokoi. Little known to Raghvendra and Rameshwari, Kokoi has come to the palace with the evil intention of getting rid of the father and daughter to inherit all the wealth. The witch Kokoi tries every trick in the book to harm Rameshwari. She uses black magic and the evil monstrous Tantrik Bhakshu, who has devils and spirits as his pets. To no avail. She uses her brother, a murder convict Sadhu Pahalwan. In vain. Because unknown to them Maruti (Lord Hanuman) is Rameshwari's saviour and bodyguard and they all have to contend with and face him. Maruti gives each one a red nose and kicks them back to the hell they rose from. Nasty Kokoi is surprised to see how a little boy is able to save his dear friend each time she tries a trick to harm Rameshwari. So she engineers another plot. One so deadly that evens the Lord is powerless. Kokoi creates a situation in the house that Rameshwari herself asks Maruti to leave her and go away. And from then on life ceases to be anything but dark for Rameshwari. Evil forces threaten to engulf her. Her life becomes a seething mass of hellish and brutish demons and beings. Her father and her days are now, numbered. Or are they? Will Hanuman come back as Maruti to save Rameshwari? This, in spite of the conundrum that Rameshwari herself forced Hanuman to take a vow on Lord Rama's name never to come back?
Maruti Mera Dosst genuinely had an idea and story that lent itself to the making of an extremely entertaining and cute little film for children who are no doubt its prime target audience. However, its treatment and execution let it down and not just the weak screenplay, but the other departments too are equally to blame.
The film lacks the naturalness and feel-good fun element that a children's film should have. The initial idea though interesting enough to begin with is developed labouriously and one cannot help wondering what a fine film this could have been in Vishal Bhardwaj and Gulzar Saab's hands for example especially in terms of screenplay, dialogue, lyrics, music and direction. The screenplay is unable to satisfactorily enter the world of children and being a film not aimed at adults, it ends up as not quite working for both adults and children. Just having a child protagonist in a film doesn't automatically make it a children's film. This is a big misconception we have in Indian cinema that must be addressed.
The film is short of the several heartwarming moments it should have had and one is also disturbed a little by the violence shown in the film but then one supposes children of today are used to it as most virtual games today are far, far more excessive in terms of blood and gore. Still...
Coming to the performances, Chandrachur Singh is saddled with a one dimensional role he can do nothing with. Unflattering camera angles particularly in some of his close up shots don't help his 'comeback' either. Sushmita Mukherjee is over the top but admittedly seems to be the one performer having a good time in the film, clearly enjoying herslef. Ritika Shrivastava makes for a cute protagonist but lacks the performance to carry the film while Erik A Nanda is ill at ease with the language even if earnest otherwise. Shahbaaz Khan's Sadhu Pahalwan track doesn't work in the film while Murli Sharma is ok. The less said about the group of actors at the beginning and end of the film, the better. Incidentally, what was all the fuss about the blue cake?
Technicalities too are very, very average be it the dull, uninspired camerawork or jarring background score. (Did one hear the strains of Yankee Doodle Dandy?) The Kailash Kher song and the kiddie song are well tuned but the sad song when the children separate just doesn't work. The songs could have done with much, much, better and livelier picturisations. The animation sequences too are weak as are the special effects, some of which are plain tacky. And why were the monsters seeming to come out of Greek mythology or some Gothic tale rather then have an Indian feel to them? The length also does the film in. A film of this sort should be of a crisp 90 minutes length at most and no more.
All in all, a nice idea for children sadly gone wrong in execution.
Upperstall review by: TheThirdMan
At the television telecast of 1989 Filmfare Awards recording(which we saw on Doordarshan in December
With the passing of veteran editor and director-Hrishikesh Mukerjhee,the curtain has fallen on an en
To be honest, maybe it's a good thing for LSD that I did not review the film as it did not really ge
good movie.
Thanks everyone for your comments. @Akash: High time for Suriya the actor to choose his films now