Theeradha Villayattu Pillai reiterates that Kollywood film-makers still think that just putting together skin show and a dash of comedy can hold a film together and help it sail through at the box-office. Debutant director Thiru has brought in various commercial elements into the film but there's no novelty about them whatsoever. What could have been a breezy entertainer turns into a tedious nightmare.
The script wriggles and meanders all over and coupled with poor acting, the result
was that some people in the audience actually walked out! The failure
of the film is that it lacks the twists and clever escapades necessary
to make it entertaining and fast-paced. Besides, the film has a TV soap
kind of treatment with each of the main characters being introduced
with a mug shot and voiceover character sketch! There are also
long-winded dialogues as well, one wonders whether they should have
made a TV serial instead.
Then, there is the overdose of characters. Following Vishal and his three friends plus three heroines can make you dizzy. Vishal tries to play the cool, fun-loving Casanova but simply lacks the attitude for it and ends up looking embarrassing. He contorts his face into different expressions in an attempt to look cute but that's sheer murder of the craft of acting. Santhanam with his comedy perks up the film a bit. Mayilsamy and Sathyan perform their roles as expected.
Of the girls, Sarah Jane gives an average enough performance but her dialogue delivery leaves much to be desired as it feels artificial and misses lip sync many a time. Neetu Chandra manages an adequate enough act and manages to emote well in a few scenes where she threatens Vishal, but beyond that she appears in unnecessary song sequences in skimpy bikini tops and costumes and little else. Tanushree Dutta's characterization as the man hater does not hold water as she very easily changes her mind and falls in love. Besides, her acting is pretty insipid too. The make-up is rather garish and looks chalky.
Mouli and Rathna play their roles effortlessly. Rathna excels in the scenes as the nagging mother and Mouli plays his role as indulgent father well. Prakash Raj, as the rowdy, dominates the screen whenever he appears.
The saving grace of the film is the fine cinematography by Arvind Krishna who uses innovative angles and makes great use of light to capture the mood of the film. He captures the beauty of Malta, flower-filled fields and brings a lyrical quality into the songs. The action and chase sequences are racy and thrilling, and the camera complements them.
Yuvan Shankar Raja's music does not have anything new to offer. En Jannal Vandha with its cheerful tone is the pick of the lot. The background score just about passes muster.
Overall, the film is highly avoidable.
At the television telecast of 1989 Filmfare Awards recording(which we saw on Doordarshan in December
With the passing of veteran editor and director-Hrishikesh Mukerjhee,the curtain has fallen on an en
To be honest, maybe it's a good thing for LSD that I did not review the film as it did not really ge
good movie.
Thanks everyone for your comments. @Akash: High time for Suriya the actor to choose his films now