|
WARNING - THE FOLLOWING IS, AS ALWAYS, A RE-REVIEW AND NOT
A REVIEW OF LAGAAN. THUS, WE ASSUME YOU HAVE ALREADY
WATCHED THE FILM - ELSE THE TEXT WILL ACT AS A MAJOR SPOILER.
UPPERSTALL HEREBY WASHES ITSELF OF ANY CONDEMNATION AND LEGAL
ISSUES AS MAYBE CONSTRUED BY AAMIR KHAN PRODUCTIONS.
|
Starring:
Aamir Khan, Gracy Singh, Paul Blackthorne and Rachel
Shelley
Directed
by: Ashutosh Gowariker
Story and Screenplay: Ashutosh Gowariker
Dialogue: K P Saxena
Cinematography: Anil Mehta
Edited by: Ballu Saluja
Music: A R Rahman
Lyrics: Javed Akhtar
Costume: Bhanu Athiya
Art Director: Nitin Chandrakant Desai
Choreography: Saroj Khan, Raju Kha, Vaibhavi Merchant,
Terrence Lewis, Ganesh Hegde
Runtime
- 4 hours less 12 minutes
|
|
Synopsis
Its either three-fold Lagaan or victory in a first time cricket
match between Avdhi speaking villagers and the British Raj.
A multi-racial love-triangle as well. If I give anything more
away here - Aamir Khan will probably sue me.
Once
upon a time in India, there was a cricket match.
How is that for a promo line? Say what you will, Lagaan, a
very trim and propah film has been undone by its publicity.
Seriously,
the entire first half falls flat on its face because of this.
One cannot help but think that this little cricket joke is
being carried a bit too far. Come on, where is the (in)famous
British oppression? The famine, the drought? The Lagaan, the
peasant's revolt? The hero in an unlikely Aamir? Where is
all this? It's a period film - they spent an unrivalled 25
crores on it - seems unlikely that this 4 hour feature is
nothing but a) a setup for a cricket match and b)
a cricket match.
But
it is exactly that.
Why
all this secrecy, this misleading promotional campaign? Its
almost as if its some dark secret, like the producers just
wanted the initials to pull it off (Lagaan has broken even,
even before its release). Did the producers think that cricket
by itself set in pre-independence era is not a convincing
idea for the public at large? Are they, somewhere along the
line, I dare say, scared that the idea may not appeal to all?
Rather a serious Brit Raj vs. Indian peasants lookey will
get an all expectant audience into their theater seats, handkerchief
ready and all? Perhaps. There really seems no other logical
explanation to this - so much have the producers been fiery
about it - that they have gone ahead and sued the rather sensitive
looking (and beautiful) Rachel Shelley, because somewhere,
probably not even on the continent of its release, she mentioned
the word "cricket." (one could be wrong here - she
possibly could've simply blown the cover, kitchen-sink and
all on a primetime Zee TV interview - but then again its not
Upperstall's job to be factually correct to the last tittle,
we simply go watch the film and comment. Period.)
In
essence, you don't go to watch Lagaan expecting a light, oft
funny, and seriously shallow and near-sighted story about
cricket in 18-whatever. You go to see a Mughal-e-Azam or a
Devadas, and for the first hour and a half are squirming in
your seat
Surely this is not it! It can't be that simple!
Did he say "cricket"?
So,
once your mind has wrestled with and been beaten by this fact,
you can sit back and enjoy the film, because it is truly remarkable.
The film is well directed. The long takes in the song sequences,
and otherwise work very well. However, the seven camera setup
during the match hardly shows. The match, thus, itself could've
easily been better and camera-wise, more dramatic.
Music is great and well used and the lyrics unforced. It is
used to set the pace well in the second half. One song though,
(name) could've easily been done without, as its quite jarring
and unnecessary. Other songs though, Mitwa and Ghanana
Ghanana in particular, are well written and composed.
On
the other hand, the Avadhi is hard to adjust to, and the publicity
surrounding Bhuj goes against the film as the fictional Champaner
is set in central India (probably UP) while costumes are strictly
Gujarati. A bit of a confusion there.
Hey,
you don't get to watch this sort of stuff in contemporary
Indian cinema, and that is a huge plus here. Sure, the story
is shallow and doesn't make you think even for a second as
its unfolds easily like a bedtime story. But the director
has clung on it, not letting go. It's a one-track, do-or-die
film. No items, no nonsense. I got a story let's stick to
it. By golly, Gowariker stuck to it, without giving it any
leeway for 4 hours, songs notwithstanding. That's commendable.
Sure,
but at the end of it all, the story could've been slightly
more substantial. And its not like you didn't know what's
going to happen in the end (what happens in the end of a Hindi
phillum on cricket? - the hero hits a six on the last ball
- duh!) And intermittently, you keep coming across the most
clichéd clichés. Like the revolt of the team
against the inclusion of an untouchable, like the Brits talk
on the field, like the end. Come to think of it - have you
ever seen a film dealing with cricket where the winning side
bowls last?
The
graph of the film is odd. Its unconventional to say the least.
Mostly the film is on a high (it's a semi-comedy for chrissakes)
and the lows are quite contrived. Its not like you sit back
and take-off into a flight extraordinaire - its more like
you start already mid-air and are 4 hours away from a dramatic
landing.
One
extremely well thought of moment in the film and worth mentionining
is the depiction of what probably was the first version of
night cricket. There should've been more of these, instead
of things like the discovery world's first spin bowler in
the form of a cripple.
Performances
are good. Gracy Singh, however, is the world's most ordinary
heroine (that's still a superlative) - the Brits are as amusing
as they are charming with their Hindi. Blackthorne is pretty
convincing, Shelley is pretty. Khan puts in everything he's
got and more. Hard work shows in this film and this is not
restricted to the cast, the crew would have been pretty dogged
about their jobs to produce something of such fine quality.
So,
all said and done - this is perhaps one of the significant
moments in 21st century Indian cinema as all expensive experiments
- that work - usually are.
|