|
When was the last time when
one saw a flawless Hindi feature film? A perfect 10 on 10?
Perhaps five years ago, Aditya Chopra's Dilwale Dulhaniya
Le Jayenge came quite close but just when one thought
he would follow it up with another near perfect picture, unfortunately
his recent Mohabbatein
out to be a real disaster. But that is another story. We're
here to re-review Mission Kashmir; ah yes Mission
Kashmir, the breath of fresh air in the refuse that is
commercial Indian cinema.
So
what are the ingredients of a perfect film? A tight script
with the right graphs, never plateau-ing, with its ups and
downs and a culmination that puts you in orbit; the visual
storytelling that depicts the script truthfully and yet appeals
in a way that few can envision; and finally, the process of
putting it all together and completing a piece of art that
is truly appreciable. Mission Kashmir fails on one
and a half counts but yet is a must-see film for those who
are steadily losing hope of the direction that Indian cinema
is taking.
Mission
Kashmir primarily fails script-wise. The problem here
is not the director's vision, but his need to fulfill the
requirements for an acceptable film for the masses. Fundamentally,
the story, of personal revenge set in a backdrop of current
Kashmir is excellent. However, to involve the central characters
in the big-picture conflict at the beginning and end and to
go completely awry in the middle is a bit of a let down. Either
we should have Kashmir as the backdrop, or the central issue.
What we have is vengeance involving two people as the issue,
and the resultant sufferer, Kashmir. This is unconvincing...
which would be quite alright if Vidhu Vinod Chopra had not
made such a big deal about Kashmiriyat and his hope that one
day all will be well with his birthplace. As we see the director
catering to the audience, numerous flaws surface as the movie
progresses. Too many flashbacks (they should've stopped at
the interval), an unorganized uncovering of the whole "mission"
(who? where? what?) and too many events happening too easily
(when they shouldn't be - like planting the bomb in Khan's
car) takes away significantly from the film.
On
performances and characterizations, Hrithik's role, for no
fault of his or the director's, he looks like he is continuing
to play the part he did in Fiza. Fiza, of course,
is easily the contender for worst film of the year (decade!)
and it was uncomfortable to see Hrithik in ditto get-up, saying
ridiculously similar lines dealing with the same jehad and
continuing to play the little boy who has lost his direction
and balance. His character even suffers because he is a little
low on IQ and had he even the most basic commonsense (which
he astutely shows when he is 10 years old) as an adult, the
story wouldn't be the way it was. Characters don't have to
be unnecessarily moronic for a fitting screenplay. An example
(and there are several as you have surely seen) would be to
point out the fact that throughout the film he did not question
what Mission Kashmir was about or why were the things
that were happening around him, happening in the first place.
Sanjay "Inayat Khan" Dutt does a wonderful job in his muti-faceted
role. Jackie Shroff, however, in his effort to add that mystique
about him, ermm… fails. All credit has to go to the
way he is directed and photographed. Sonali Kulkarni a) is
either completely miscast or b) is untouched by the make-up
person. She could be Hrithik's lover instead of mother. This
brings us to Preity Zinta, Hrithik's lover and the be all
and end all of Kashmir's entertainment industry (from a live
performer to TV news reader, from event manager to video editor).
The script gets her all wrong in the second half as, in my
opinion, she becomes the true hero of the film as she "unravels"
the plot of (the actual) Mission Kashmir in a video. Now this
video bit (which is really so critical to the story) completely
went over my head. How did she piece together from what had
been shot of location on a handycam, a scene from the future
where Hazratbul is blown up? The only explanation that one
has is that they were high-end computer generated animations
- created by the militants who are portrayed living in shambles.
This, of course, makes no sense.
So what makes Mission Kashmir
a very good film to spend the money on and watch it in theaters?
Well for starters, Binod Pradhan's cinematography. This man
is way ahead of any other cameraperson in this country. Santosh
Sivan included. His work in this film along with Chopra's
near-flawless direction contributes to what is easily one
of the slickest Indian films in a long time. In fact, one
is tempted to call this film the most technically superior
film made in this country. Its awesome sound (sfx, music,
everything) more than contributes to its advantage. But getting
back to Pradhan's delectable camera work…. From the
unique (to Indian cinema) perspectives of the action sequences
(so what if they re-did the Matrix, the very fact they pulled
it of with it looking every bit as good as the original, is
enough to write home about) to the panoramic aerial shots
of the Kashmir landscape, in these sequences this film matches
any of its Hollywood counterparts frame to frame. Chopra's
direction too reiterates his commitment to better cinema as
one can easily see that no short-cuts have been taken during
the actual shoot. He is not one to be content resting on his
laurels of being an Oscar-nominated director (An Encounter
with Faces).
But
the greatest achievement is that for the first time, a film
has come along that portrays Kashmir in its true colors. Not
a single shot is exaggerated in terms of content (disregarding
the cinematic climax) and yet the turbulent beauty of this
land is depicted in its true and current state. Generation-x,
who has heard all about it, but seen nothing of this land,
is pleasantly surprised to see Kashmir as it is. The Kashmir
on film is the real Kashmir. One that few people have had
the opportunity to experience. Wonderful.
And
a special mention for Bhumro. Not only is the tune
one of the catchiest and the sequence, a highlight of the
film, Chopra's constant use of this Kashmiri folk song as
the film's theme is marvelously executed.
All
in all, I feel sorry for Vinod Chopra. He is just at the wrong
place at the wrong time. He deserves more than the rigid-minded
Indian cine-goer. His dedication to quality filmmaking is
wasted as he tries to appease this mind with the conventional
three-hour song and dance ridden film. Had he made this same
film for another audience, any other audience, without the
Hindi film histrionics and a length that did not exceed the
conventional hour and a half, with a plot that was a little
more plausible and one that did not require superheroes or
multi-faceted characterizations, Mission Kashmir would
truly be no less than brilliant. But for now, he has to settle
for less: a highly watch able film.
|