ore kadal (malayalam) - a re-review

Starring

Mammootty, Narain, Meera Jasmine, Ramya Krishnan

Story and Screenplay

Shyama Prasad

Art Direction

Muthu Raj

Editing

Vinod Sukumaran

Cinematography

Azhakappan

Lyrics

Girish Puthencherry

Music

Ousepachan

Produced by

Vindhyan

Directed by

Shyama Prasad

 

"What we know, wish to know, struggle to know, must try to know about love or rejection, being alone or together and dying together or alone – can all that be streamlined, put in order, match the standards of consistency, cohesiveness and completeness set for the lesser matters? Perhaps it can – in the infinity of time, that is. " - Zygmunt Bauman, Liquid Love

Since the days of Padmarajan and KG George, very rarely has Malayalam film looked at man-woman relationship so sensuously and closely as Shyama Prasad's Ore Kadal. It is a film that takes an incisive look at the fragile but complex web of sexual relationships. The film, based on the Bengali novel Hirak Deepthi by Sunil Gangopadhyay, portrays some very intense moments so rare in Indian cinema, where an 'ordinary' housewife (Deepthi played by Meera Jasmine) enters into a sexual relationship with a philanderer-economist, and walks out of her family to join him. More importantly, the film dares to let many loose ends hang out, leaving many questions unanswered and many troubling scores unsettled, just like in any true life situation.

The film begins with Nathan, the middle-aged hero, ( Mammootty in a very atypical role of a vulnerable lover) an urban uprooted 'free' individual driving a car in the middle of a city cutting his last tenuous links with his home. Apparently, his aunt is on her deathbed; but he is unwilling to make that emotional move or return back to his home and family, something that is affirmed and endorsed by his girlfriend, Bela (Ramya Krishnan). He is one who has cut himself away from the drifts of natal bonding and kinship, and wants to live his life engrossed in pleasure-seeking and academic pursuits (though most of his 'findings' are thoroughly outdated, especially about population as the cause of poverty etc). Surfing through life, he is least concerned with the details of other people's lives except using them as database for his research. Cut off from the day-to-day exigencies of the mundane life that is teeming outside, even the sight of an accident on the way fails to evoke any response in him. The world is something 'outside' him, to be observed, analysed and enjoyed. And he himself asserts he is not interested in love or any kind of attachment, but only in 'pleasure sans anything social or emotional.' In a way, the film is about his fall.

At another level, the film is all about connections - people desperately trying to connect and relate to each other. The leitmotif shots in the film, a la Kieslowski, is that of cityscapes of rising apartments; in the foreground is the complex web of telephone posts and lines, connecting and criss-crossing. In the opening sequence, we find all the three main characters tallking over phone: Nathan spurning the plea from home, Deepthi desperately trying to contact her husband who is out of town to inform him about the illness of their kid, and Jayan (the husband played by Narain) pleading to his friend to find a job for him. When Deepthi, a middle class wife who lives in the same apartment complex, is hesitantly but fatally attracted to Nathan, one such random connection is established. But everything goes awry once he realizes that the child born to her is his. He is haunted by guilt, while her life is shattered as she is driven to madness. But in an affirmative end, she comes back to him with her children and he accepts them with open arms, a truly touching moment in the film. The film ends with left with his girl child slowly climbing her way up the stairs with a bewildered look. Where will life take her?

As usual, the woman who dares to venture out of the family to pursue her own sensuality and crosses the boundaries of monogamous love, is punished severely. She goes insane, and has to seek desperate refuge in devotion. But she is not able to ignore the call of love. But would it turn out to be a journey to the very same sea of marital life? As for her and him, there is a reversal of roles in the narrative. In the case of Nathan, it is a 'fall' from his manly certitudes to become a fragile and vulnerable human being. Deepthi moves from indecision, insanity and devotion to a make a choice of her own. She goes to the man she loves; though it may be a journey from one family to another. For, it is also a reunion of sorts, something that brings about the formation of a typical nuclear family at the end of all turbulence.

But why should the act of procreation be the key to all these transformations and turbulence? Why should sex be a sin for woman and guilt for man, once it transgresses the limits of transient physical pleasure to seek continuity in procreation? Why should the woman be always condemned to fatal attachments, whether it be a man or a family? Why for her there is only insanity and devotion between men and families? Why is it that for a woman each man she relates to turn into a terminus, anchor or fate of sorts, while for a man it could still be just another experience? Why should all the women who are 'now free' have an abusive past (like in the case of Bela)? Why is it that it is all arrivals for a woman, while for man each encounter opens up yet another possibility for departures? Relationships, the searing lure of love, the pain and agony of having to live a life without love, the pain of walking into someone's life and of walking out, the trauma of giving birth to babies and families, the tortuous wander between lust and love…these are the dilemmas that haunt this film.

Excellent camera work (Azhakappan), editing (Vinod Sukumaran) and background score (Ousepachan) capture the shifting narrative moods in an extremely evocative manner. For instance, the character of the husband (Narain) is composed visually by resorting to dull colours in order to create a kind of subdued presence suitable to the character, while sensuous Deepthi is foregrounded in stark colours.

One thing though. Despite its 'European' looks, one can feel the suffocation of an Indian film - one that has to visualize the narrative within the censorship norms, in effect, to make a film about physical relationship without 'revealing' bodies, forced to overcharge words and utterances to cover up for sensuality. This takes a lot away from an otherwise good effort.

Dr C S Venkiteswaran, is a Kerala based film critic who has won state and national awards for film direction and film criticism. He is now Director, School of Media Studies, Kochi, Kerala. He writes regularly about film in various national and international journals and handles a weekly column 'Rumblestrip' in New Indian Express.

Site developed by



dreamscape.co.in
Google
Web upperstall.com