welcome–
a re-review |
 |
|
Starring |
Feroz Khan, Anil
Kapoor, Nana Patekar,
Akshay Kumar, Katrina Kaif, Mallika
Sherawat, Paresh Rawal |
Story
/ Writer |
Praful Parikh,
Rajiv Kaul, Anees Bazmee |
Screenplay |
Praful Parikh,
Rajiv Kaul, Anees Bazmee |
Editing
|
Ashfaque Makrani |
Cinematography |
Sanjay F Gupta |
Lyrics |
Shabbir Ahmed,
Ibrahim Ashq, Anjaan Sagari, Sameer,
Anand Raj Anand |
Music |
Sajid, Wajid,
Anand Raj Anand, Himesh Reshammiya |
Produced
by |
Firoz Nadiadwala |
Directed
by |
Anees Bazmee |
|
|
Like the character
of Uday Shetty in Welcome, the critic
needs to ‘control’ himself while reviewing
this film. Try and not lash out, not completely
trash this film for its poor sensibilities, uninspired
direction, and regressive outlook. Because the
fact of the matter is that Welcome rouses
masses, leaves them satisfied, and is easily going
to be the biggest hits of the year. So what yardstick
does one use? Should this review deter readers
from the film based on a vague understanding of
what cinema should be, or should I ask you to
watch this fare that caters to the lowest common
denominator – and contributes to creating
the image of ‘Bollywood’ as it is
in the hinterland, as it is in the west. It’s
strange but the Indian film critic is stuck in
no man’s land.
The
solution is of course that instead of ranting
on about poor cinema scoring at the BO, critics
need to acknowledge that Indian films are now
of two types. The first type is the legacy stuff:
films that are made for a pan-Indian audience
(if such a thing is even conceivable) –
much like Welcome. Actors (even relatively
smaller ones) get paid nine figures and all they
have to do is sleepwalk their way through their
part. There is no ‘acting’ involved.
In an insane revelation, at a B-center theater
packed with 1100 men hooting for Mallika Sherawat
the loudest, all it took was a random (misplaced)
shy hands-on-face look from Akshay Kumar for a
deafening reaction. Directors like Anees Baazmi
know what works with these guys, they turn on
audiences with German engineering-like precision
while the more sophisticated directors concentrate
on trying to create a cinematic masterpiece that
talks the language of cinema (rather than of the
audience) to communicate to a pan-cinema audience.
These ‘sophisticated’ directors helm
the second type of Indian films in production
today: the erstwhile crossover/multiplex films.
You remember the crossovers don’t you? Films
that were made for global audiences; Indian filmmakers
soon realized that the global audience wasn’t
so forthcoming afterall. Even sub $1 million films
were struggling to break even, while the Salman
and Shahrukh Khan starrers continued to be the
biggest overseas grossers. Then the multiplex
revolution exploded locally and crossover films
crossed right back over in the garb of multiplex
films. At least now any film with a basic advertising/marketing
budget was breaking even and with multiplexes
still mushrooming (more in B-centers now, having
overrun the A’s) there is hope yet for smaller,
non-mainstream films. By smaller, I only mean
in terms of sheer hoot-power (as in the absence
of item numbers and absurd expressions) and not
in terms of production value or star power (try
Bheja Fry) or content (Chak De, TZP).
Indian films have surely and steadily branched
off into two directions and any product trying
to stride both will fail. Critics must respect
the mainstream, pan-India film and give them their
due for entertaining an audience that thrives
and needs their 3 hours of weekly flights of fantasy
from their wearisome lives. Perhaps they should
refrain from critiquing at all in cases such as
Welcome (because regardless of the quality,
the BO will be on fire) and limit themselves to
the India’s latest new wave – one
that is larger and more sure-footed in every way
than the previous. With the burgeoning populace
there is space and money for both branches of
Indian cinema.
And as far as Welcome goes, you know
what audience you belong to. Take your decision.
|